Colorado Prop 127
HOW TO HELP LINKS AT BOTTOM
In the upcoming November ballot in Colorado, Proposition 127 has sparked significant debate, with claims circulating that are misleading or outright false. Let's break down four key lies that have been repeated about this initiative, which seeks to ban mountain lion and bobcat hunting.
The first myth? “Mountain lions are inedible.” This claim has been used to create an emotional argument, portraying the hunt as wasteful or unnecessary. In reality, mountain lion meat is not only edible but is considered by many as a delicacy. While this may be surprising to some, thousands of hunters and food enthusiasts across the country have found mountain lion meat to be quite delicious. Those pushing the "inedible" narrative are ignoring the truth, misleading people into thinking the hunt serves no consumable purpose.
Second, Proposition 127 claims to protect lynx, implying that this species is at risk in Colorado. However, lynx are already federally protected across the United States. You cannot hunt lynx in the United States, and this inclusion in the proposition seems to be an emotional tactic to sway voters by making them think lynx need additional protection when they do not.
The third falsehood is the idea that continued mountain lion hunting will drive the species to extinction. In fact, the opposite is true. According to Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), regulated hunting has helped the population recover. In the 1960s, there were only a few hundred mountain lions in the state. Thanks to wildlife management and regulated hunting, there are now approximately 4,500 mountain lions in Colorado. CPW biologists, who are responsible for managing wildlife populations, have data to show that mountain lions are thriving, not on the brink of extinction.
Finally, proponents of Proposition 127 often state that it will stop trophy hunting. Yet trophy hunting for mountain lions has been illegal in Colorado for many years. Hunters are required by law to prepare the meat of the mountain lions they harvest for consumption, and the head and hide must be submitted to authorities for mandatory checks. So, the claim that this proposition is needed to end trophy hunting is simply another exaggeration. Trophy hunting, as defined by the backers of the proposition, is already banned.
In conclusion, Proposition 127 is being presented with a host of misleading claims. Whether you're in favor of hunting or not, it's important to be informed. Wildlife management, especially in Colorado, has been carefully regulated for decades by CPW, ensuring that both wildlife and ecosystems remain balanced. Proposition 127, if passed, could disrupt this well-established system, potentially harming the very wildlife it claims to protect.
Don't just take our word for it - Click these links and do your own research:
Read CPW's FAQ's on Mountain Lion and Bobcat here.
Watch CPW biologist Mark Viera give a presentation on Mountain Lion & Bobcat in Colorado.
Want To Help?
Check out the issues committee fighting this proposal: https://wildlifedeservebetter.com/
Get Your Yard Sign - Info Here
Download Media - PW: Wildlife - Go Here
Learn about hound hunting - Watch & Share Lionheart - Go Here
Learn about Prop 127 from non-hunters - Go Here
CPW is against PROP 127 & Ballot Box Biology - Info Here
The information on this site is not, nor is it intended to be, used for the carrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation except as is permitted under Internal Revenue Code Sections 501(c)(3) and 501(h). The information contained in these emails or call scripts are intended to be entirely educational in order to inform members of the government of various issues related to hunting, fishing, conservation, etc. The information contained in these emails or call scripts are not being sent by or on behalf of Howl for Wildlife or any of its directors, officers, agents, affiliates, or anyone else connected with Howl for Wildlife. Moreover, the user has the right and ability to alter this email or call script to fit their requirements, views, opinions, etc.